Dollan wrote:I don't know. Galileo seemed to put in a lot of time covering Europa. Or maybe it just seems like it?
I think it just seemed like it. Remember, Galileo had the screwed up high gain antenna which means it couldn't monitor its targets all the time on approach or while it was approaching something else. I think we actually got about 1 out of every 20 images that were originally planned (heck, when Cassini flew past Jupiter on the way to Saturn it returned more images of Jupiter than Galileo had for the previous 5 years).
So it wouldn't surprise me if the few snapshots we got of Europa at high phase angle might have been just taken at the wrong time or the wrong angle or looking in the wrong place, because we only have a literal handful of images that actually looked for plumes.
Given the apparently tidal origin of some of the cracks on Europa's surface (the cuspoid ridges), it always did strike me as somewhat surprising that we didn't see any evidence of current activity. Particularly when the theory for their origin implied that they were still actively being created by tides.
If there *is* a global ocean under that ice, I wonder if it would be able to persist for billions of years and still have active geysers.
That's a headscratcher for me too. Maybe radiogenic heating + tidal heating is enough even in such a small body to keep its interior liquid? We know that Callisto has an ocean too even though it's not tidally heated - but it has a lot more rock to act as a radiogenic heat source than Enceladus does.
So many questions, so few probes.... I remember when I used to think that the Saturn system was vaguely boring!
I suspect that Cassini will be targeting Enceladus a lot more (probably in an extended mission, which has got to happen unless Bush's funding plans for his crazy manned missions get in the way - which is actually ooking frighteningly possible) so we may get some answers...